Showing posts with label Bullshit Antenna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bullshit Antenna. Show all posts

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Financial Crisis 2008: Who is to blame? Whose fault was it?

The media, as always, will (and has) blame(d) Wall Street and greedy Republicans. But the facts are quite different. To better understand who is to blame for the crisis, we should listen to those who have a lot to lose in a financial crisis and those who were inside the banking industry. Hedge fund managers, whose financial well-being is directly proportional (or perhaps exponential might be a better word) to their performance, have a lot riding on guessing the performance of companies, commodities, and the financial system as a whole.

I found these two great insights into what happened, first by Stephen Schwarzman, chairman of hedge fund Blackstone Group, and Noel Sheppard, editor of NewsBusters who worked in the banking industry during and after the 1980s S&L crisis.

Schwarzman: "It’s a perfect storm. It started with Congress encouraging lending to lower-income people. You went from subprime loans being 2% of total loans in 2002 to 30% of total loans in 2006. That kind of enormous increase swept into the net people who shouldn’t have been borrowing.... Those loans were packaged into CDOs rated AAA [by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac], which led the investment-banking firms [buying them] to do little to no due diligence, and the securities were distributed throughout the world, where they started defaulting." [Read full article here]

Sheppard: He quotes the Investor's Business Daily, which pinpoints the start of the crisis to Jimmy Carter's Community Reinvestment Act, which forced banks to lend to uncreditworthy borrowers, mostly in minority areas. Then, "Despite warnings from GOP members of Congress in 1992, Clinton pushed extensive changes to the rules requiring lenders to make questionable loans." [Read full article here]

So it wasn't too much regulation of the private market that caused the problem, it was too little regulation of the quasi-government entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and unsound laws passed in the name of equality for everyone.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Who chooses Google logo birthdays?

Yesterday it was Beatrix Potter, a couple of months ago it was Walter Grupius, the founder of the Bauhaus architectural movement. Now, I've personally never read any of Potter's stories as a child, but I'm sure they're very good. I'm however pretty familiar with the Bauhaus movement, as there are plenty of these ugly, perfectly square or rectangular buildings here in Seattle and elsewhere around the States and Europe when "modern art" became the fashion. Only the drab communist-style buildings dotting (thankfully many have been torn down) the landscape of the old Soviet Union and its satellites are uglier.

My point is this: who chooses to commemorate a certain person and not another? The logos themselves are pretty, but I question the choices. For example, Simon Bolivar, the liberator of a few South American countries, was born on July 24th, yet he was not featured. Perhaps only artists are featured. Then why not celebrate Hemingway's birthday on July 21st or George Bernard Shaw's on July 26th?

I think Google should stick to compiling and sorting information. It seems like there is too much editorial power for someone to pick a particular person that millions of people see (even the Google news section is automatically generated), cute as the logos may be.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Beijing Olympics -- Cradle of the Revolution?

China: I think it's good for you that the Olympics are in China. Yeah, you deserve the bad press for Tibet, but overall it's great exposure for you and I hope that your country's GDP/capita continues to increase. You've been poor for way too long. Which brings me to the following question: WHAT THE FUCK is this bullshit doing on the front page of the Beijing 2008 Web site?




Celebrating the "Cradle of Revolution"? Here's the full press release:

Chinese 'Cradle of Revolution' hosts Olympic Torch Relay
Updated:2008-07-02

(YAN'AN, July 2) – A few minutes after noon on Wednesday, July 02, Wang Xilin ignited the flame cauldron to signal the end of the torch relay in the city of Yan'an, Shaanxi Province.

The relay in the city began at 8:15 this morning, when 93-year-old Red Army veteran Liu Tianyou started off the Torch Relay from the site of the Zaoyuan Revolution.

As China's "Cradle of Revolution," Yan'an holds a prominent place in the country's history. From 1935 to 1948, Yan'an was the headquarters of the Chinese Communist revolution. The city served as the country's military headquarters during the Chinese Anti-Japanese War and China's War of Liberation. In addition, Yan'as was former home of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.

Along a route that highlighted the historical and cultural importance of Yan'an and its surroundings, a total of 208 torchbearers took part in the 6.31 kilometer-long relay.

The sacred flame will travel to Yangling and Xianyang next.


So you're celebrating the torch going through Yan'an because it was the headquarters of the Chinese Communist Revolution and the former home of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.

THIS IS (Communism) what got you into trouble in the first place! If it hadn't been for communism, you'd probably be the richest country in the world a long time ago and millions of your own citizens would not have been killed from starvation and political prosecution.

So celebrate the rise of China, the growth of your cities, the increasing standard of living, the ingenuity and perseverance of the Chinese people, etc., but don't celebrate mass-murderer Mao and "the cradle of revolution". That's fucked up.

Monday, June 23, 2008

McCain's $300 million prize for a new auto battery? (Bullshit)

Dude,

Do you have any idea how much venture capital is devoted into energy? A LOT. This is another of your bullshit gimmicks like the "gas tax holiday". If you want to do something useful, send that money back to taxpayers. And instead of focusing on how to bomb Iran, maybe you should go to college and take an economics class.

Fucking dumb ass...
----------------

McCain to Propose Prize
For New Auto Battery

Associated Press
June 23, 2008 12:51 p.m.

PHOENIX -- John McCain hopes to solve the country's energy crisis with cold hard cash.

The presumed Republican nominee is proposing a $300 million government prize to whoever can develop an automobile battery that far surpasses existing technology. The bounty would equate to $1 for every man, woman and child in the country, "a small price to pay for helping to break the back of our oil dependency," Mr. McCain said in remarks prepared for delivery Monday at Fresno State University in California.

...

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Naymz: STOP the SPAM information gathering of profiles

I Googled my girlfriend's name and the second entry that came up was her Naymz profile with her outdated professional title. Because she had changed careers over a year ago, the outdated listing is detrimental to her current business. I asked her why she signed up for an account at Naymz; she told me she never did. Just in case, I put in her e-mail address ("forgot username/password"), but nothing came up.

It turns out that Naymz actively scans the Web and sets up profiles without your permission. I'm sure it's (unfortunately) somehow legal, but it's just plain wrong. Someone can do a background check on pretty much anyone, but at least that person's name doesn't come up on a search engine with a link to a background-check company (although I've seen those come up as paid advertisements, but not with the person's name on the advertisement itself).

The way to erase your profile is to click on the "This is me!" button and then the delete profile button. I had to look at Naymz' Help section to figure that out. It's the first FAQ, which means a lot of other people must be pissed off too.

In summary: FUCK YOU Naymz!

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Google Earth Hour Bullshit

Very good idea, but not buying it. Why are corporations pretending they're "green" and "environmentally conscious", b.s., b.s.? Of course, it's good for their image. True, but it's still bullshit.

Anyway, while Google is promoting "going green", their founders, Larry Page and Sergei Brin, seem not to have caught on--they're flying on their Boeing 767 wide-body corporate jet, a.k.a., the "party plane".


The Register (UK)
Google founders spar over 'party plane'

By Ashlee Vance in Mountain View (ashlee.vance@theregister.co.uk)
Published Friday 7th July 2006 20:44 GMT

Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin need more adult supervision than previously thought.

While the two billionaires agree that they both love colored balls, they can't agree on what types of beds should be placed in their Boeing 767 wide body corporate jet. Brin and Page broke out in a dispute over whether or not Brin should have a long California King size bed in their plane, according to documents tied to a lawsuit over the jet. Ultimately, Google CEO Eric Schmidt had to chime in and make the bed decision for the youngsters.

"Sergey, you can have whatever bed you want in your room; Larry, you can have whatever kind of bed you want in your bedroom. Let's move on," Schmidt told the pair, according to the court documents.

The Wall Street Journal today made the nasty bed dispute public after uncovering a battle between Blue City – Google's holding company for the plane – and Leslie Jennings – a designer contracted to do customer work on the Google craft. Blue City canned Jennings last October, claiming he failed to rework the Boeing as requested. Meanwhile, Jennings is seeking payment for his work and has denied Blue City's claims.

With legal costs rising, Jennings is none too happy about the situation.

"They're intent on seeing whether they can break every bone in my body and drain every cent out of me," he told the paper.

The battle has turned up some wonderful details about the Google boys. According to the court documents, Schmidt has referred to the corporate jet as a "party plane." And, in fact, the Googlers wanted things such as hammocks hanging from the ceiling and a cocktail lounge in their jet.
...
Read the full article.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

"80G Luv Gov" Spitzer

"Prosecutors have considered charging Mr. Spitzer with violations of the Mann Act, which bars transporting people across state lines for prostitution. Other possible charges could include structuring transactions to evade financial-reporting requirements; violating bans on interstate travel with intent to commit a crime; and helping an illegal entity to launder money. Some of the charges carry prison terms of more than five years.

But Mr. Spitzer's lawyers argued Tuesday that the governor didn't violate federal money-laundering or structuring laws because he didn't hide the transactions, which were in his name and from his bank accounts. In negotiations with prosecutors of Manhattan's U.S. Attorney's office, his lead lawyer, Michele Hirshman, a partner at the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, said it would be unfair to charge Mr. Spitzer. People familiar with the legal team's thinking say Ms. Hirshman argued that men who use the services of prostitutes rarely get charged with crimes, even when prostitutes and ringleaders do."

Does anyone see anything wrong with this picture? Why are prostitutes and ringleaders charged, but not the johns? I personally think prostitution should be legal, like it is in Singapore, but if you are going to charge someone, it should definitely include "Lov Guv 80G" Spitzer, who clearly broke the law by facilitating the illegal transportation of a prostitute across state lines.

Monday, February 04, 2008

Shut down NASA!!!

What the fuck is this???
--------------------

Is Anyone Out There?

NASA Will Beam Beatles Song Into Deep Space

By GINA SUNSERI

Feb. 4, 2008 —

Is there life on other planets in our galaxy?

On the off chance there is, are you listening? Because today, NASA will spin a song into space for the first time  The Beatles' "Across the Universe" will go into deep space at 7 p.m. ET.

Today is the 40th anniversary of the song's first recording.

Paul McCartney is happy about being beamed into space. "Amazing! Well done, NASA!" McCartney wrote in a message to the space agency. "Send my love to the aliens. All the best, Paul."

This is also the 50th anniversary of NASA's founding and marks two other anniversaries for NASA: the launch, 50 years ago this week, of Explorer 1, the first U.S. satellite, and the creation, 45 years ago, of the Deep Space Network, an international network of antennae that supports missions to explore the universe.

The Beatles transmission is being aimed at the North Star, Polaris, which is 431 light years from Earth. The song, written by John Lennon, will travel across the universe at a speed of 186,000 miles per second.
...

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Hillary is not an Evil Robot! (not)

I feel for you Hillary... And because of that, I will now vote for you in the New Hampshire Primary!

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

No Free Energy Episode #3 (Ethanol is bull shit)

See this article from the Wall Street Journal:

Ethanol Craze Cools
As Doubts Multiply
Claims for Environment,
Energy Use Draw Fire;
Fighting on the Farm
By LAUREN ETTER
November 28, 2007; Page A1

Little over a year ago, ethanol was winning the hearts and wallets of both Main Street and Wall Street, with promises of greater U.S. energy independence, fewer greenhouse gases and help for the farm economy. Today, the corn-based biofuel is under siege.

In the span of one growing season, ethanol has gone from panacea to pariah in the eyes of some. The critics, which include industries hurt when the price of corn rises, blame ethanol for pushing up food prices, question its environmental bona fides and dispute how much it really helps reduce the need for oil.
[chart]

A recent study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development concluded that biofuels "offer a cure [for oil dependence] that is worse than the disease." A National Academy of Sciences study said corn-based ethanol could strain water supplies. The American Lung Association expressed concern about a form of air pollution from burning ethanol in gasoline. Political cartoonists have taken to skewering the fuel for raising the price of food to the world's poor.
...
Read the full article.

See my previous posts about energy: #1 and #2.

Finally, the History Channel's Modern Marvels discusses the pros and cons of various types of renewable energy.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

John Murtha = George Bush on an Al Gore diet?



From the Wall Street Journal:

"If John Murtha were a businessman, he'd be the biggest employer in this town.
...
Johnstown's [PA] good fortune has come at the expense of taxpayers everywhere else. Defense contractors have found that if they open an office here and hire the right lobbyist, they can get lucrative, no-bid contracts. Over the past decade, Concurrent Technologies Corp., a defense-research firm that employs 800 here, got hundreds of millions of dollars thanks to Rep. Murtha despite poor reviews by Pentagon auditors. The National Drug Intelligence Center, with 300 workers, got $509 million, though the White House has tried for years to shut it down as wasteful and unnecessary. Another beneficiary: MTS Technologies, run by a man who got his start some 40 years ago shining shoes at Mr. Murtha's Johnstown Minute Car Wash."
...

Friday, July 27, 2007

Private Equity: "I create nothing; I own" ?

I'm an ardent supporter of capitalism, but the way private equity companies structure deals such as the one outlined in the Wall Street Journal article below only benefits the takeover sharks. Obviously there's nothing wrong with restructuring if it helps a company's long-term prospects, but a successful corporation has to share some of its wealth with its workers; if it doesn't the company will usually fail at some point assuming there's free competition. In a case such as this one however, the company that was bought out had no choice but to lay off its workers because the private equity company that bought it saddled it with debt and then immediately took a dividend out for itself.

It's reminiscent of the movie Wall Street and the famous line by Gordon Gekko (played by Michael Douglas): "I create nothing, I own." See my post from last year about private equity--the WSJ article mentioned is eerily similar to this one.


PAGE ONE
DOW JONES REPRINTS
IN THE TRENCHES
How a Blackstone Deal
Shook Up a Work Force
Layoffs at Travelport, Dividend for Investors;
'On Pins and Needles'

By IANTHE JEANNE DUGAN
July 27, 2007; Page A1

CENTENNIAL, Colo. -- Not long after the Blackstone Group bought Travelport Ltd. last August, workers at the company's office campus here began feeling the squeeze.
Two months after the deal closed, scores of employees were lugging boxes of personal belongings to their cars, having lost their jobs. Under Blackstone's ownership, the travel-reservations conglomerate has laid off 841 people, about 10% of its work force. Blackstone, a private-equity firm, has already recouped all of the money it invested in Travelport.

Similar scenes have been unfolding at companies around the nation, a human toll of the corporate-buyout boom. Private-equity firms, which say they bring sorely needed financial discipline to poorly run companies, have been slashing costs and extracting profits at warp speed. As the cycle of buying and selling companies has intensified, life in the trenches can be unstable and traumatic.

By the end of 2007, Travelport expects to slash costs by $150 million. Last week, it brought public its online reservations unit, Orbitz Worldwide Inc., using the proceeds to pay off debt. Its Galileo unit, which feeds airline information to travel agents, is the focus of much of the overhaul. Many of the job cuts have occurred at the company's data-operations center here outside Denver, where some jobs have been outmoded by shifts in technology and in the way people buy airline tickets and rent cars, executives say.

John Kliegel, 41 years old, a computer-systems analyst, and his twin, Russell, a technical writer, were both laid off. They're selling the house they share because they can no longer afford it. Don Kleppinger, a 46-year-old software engineer with five sons, lost his job, leaving him without health insurance for several months. Grace Covyeau, 63, who lost her job as a telecommunications engineer, took a part-time job last month making sandwiches and coffee at King Soopers grocery store.

"It came as a shock," says Michael Berson, 49, who lost his job as a data engineer in October, three years after receiving a "Super Star" award for saving the company $1.2 million on telecommunications costs. Mr. Berson has moved to Tulsa, where he is looking for a new job.

In addition to the 841 layoffs, 1,500 Travelport workers have left voluntarily since the buyout. The company says it has hired 1,582 new workers during that period, and has invested heavily in new technology.

Travelport Chief Executive Jeff Clarke describes the Centennial operation as the "factory" through which thousands of transactions pass every second. "We need to shift into new technologies," he says. "Some require productivity improvements and often will lead to layoffs."

To complete their $4.3 billion Travelport purchase, Blackstone and Technology Crossover Ventures, a Palo Alto, Calif., venture-capital firm that now owns 11%, invested $1 billion and borrowed the rest. That debt landed on Travelport's balance sheet. In March, Travelport borrowed an additional $1.1 billion and paid it out as a dividend to the two firms, returning all their money in just seven months.

"This is likely one of the quickest returns of invested capital for a private-equity deal of its size," Travelport's new chief financial officer, Michael Rescoe, said in a May conference call with analysts.

The buyout boom has been lucrative for Blackstone partners and investors, which include large institutions such as pension funds. Last year, Blackstone managed assets valued at about $88 billion and earned $2.27 billion, according to a prospectus for its own initial public offering in June. Its chief executive, Stephen Schwarzman, who resides in a 35-room Manhattan apartment, made more than $650 million on the offering and retained a 24% stake now worth more than $5 billion.

....
Read more here...

Monday, July 23, 2007

Maternity Leave: U.S. Worst in the World



For being the richest country in the world, this is a disgrace. Isn't the Democratic Party suppose to fix this? Oh wait, it's the Republicans: they're the "family values" party. Wrong--everybody is a pawn to the corporations.

[Graphic is from the most recent issue of National Geographic Magazine]

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Global Warming Doomsday Called Off



It is easy to follow the pack. When the winds shift on an issue--as is the case with the war in Iraq--most of the public unconciously follows course and skillfull politicians conciously change their viewpoints. Global warming is another such issue. During the early and mid-1970s many scientists, the news media, and the public believed that the world was cooling and that we could be on the verge of a new ice age. Now of course, most believe in the opposite.

Let us hope that no rash and very expensive decisions are made on incomplete data and incorrect assumptions. There is no doubt that the Earth is currently in a warming state, but to say that it is caused by human activity is extremely doubtful at best, a fabricated lie at worst. This documentary shows why that is the case. (I've previously written on this issue--here's another good documentary.)

If you want to change the world, find another issue that's more important such as ending the war in Iraq, global poverty, or habitat destruction (the biggest threat to humanity today).

Friday, July 06, 2007

No Free (Energy) Lunches

Note to Brad Pitt: take the bus back next time.

From AutoblogGreen:
Brad Pitt thinks BMW's Hydrogen 7 is perfect for Ocean's 13 premiere
Posted Jun 6th 2007 1:39PM by Sebastian Blanco


At the premiere of Ocean's 13 at Grauman's Chinese Theatre last night, Brad Pitt arrived in a BMW Hydrogen 7. Our source didn't say if Angelina Jolie arrived in a different vehicle, but if you want oodles more photos from the event (both Brad and Angelina were there), here's IESB's gratuitous photo gallery with all the stars.
BMW is getting a lot of publicity out of the Hydrogen 7s they've got in America.
...

Here's the real scoop on the environmental efficacy of the vehicle from Spiegel:

BMW'S HYDROGEN 7
Not as Green as it Seems
By Christian Wüst
BMW is manufacturing the first series of hydrogen fueled cars. They're not as green as they seem. For a start, they're incredibly thirsty -- and they will put more strain on the environment than a heavy diesel truck.
....
The problem is that hydrogen is in scarce supply and producing it requires vast amounts of energy. Climate-friendly production of liquid hydrogen on a large scale presupposes a virtually unlimited supply of ecologically produced electricity -- not something likely to materialize in the near future. That's why energy experts from the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy believe forcing the transition to a hydrogen-based economy within the next three to four decades is "not an ecologically sound" idea.

Storing the volatile energy source also requires energy and money. The only method that promises a reasonable storage life is liquid storage at temperatures below -253 degrees Celsius (-423 degrees Fahrenheit). The process of cooling the storage facility down to such a low temperature alone uses up to one-third of the energy contained in one fuel tank.
...
And so, in creating the Hydrogen 7, BMW is announcing a future of putatively clean, full-throttle driving. The new car caters to the pleasing fantasy of customers spoiled by high-horsepower engines: That they can conform to ecological standards without making any sacrifices, burning "clean" fuel to their heart's content. Advertizing images display the Hydrogen 7 against a backdrop of wind turbines and solar panels.

But the image is one of deceit. Because the hydrogen dispensed at the new filling station is generated primarily from petroleum and natural gas, the new car puts about as much strain on the environment as a heavy truck with a diesel engine. Add the loss of environmental benefits involved in the production and transportation of the putatively clean fuel to the consumption of the car itself and you get an actual consumption corresponding to considerably more than 20 liters (5.3 gallons) of fossil fuel.

The environment isn't the only loser: Customers will also have to shell out a lot of money for their deceptive display of ecologically responsible driving. The current standard price for liquid hydrogen is 57 euro cents (0.73 US cents) per liter (0.3 gallons). And the price tag on a 100 kilometer (62 mile) drive in the Hydrogen 7, at a comfortable speed, is about €30 ($38).

...

Friday, May 04, 2007

Cut Global Warming, Eat Less Red Meat (not Al Gore style)!



...
The panel also said for the first time that lifestyle changes could help fight global warming. It gave no examples, but IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri said these could include turning down the thermostat and eating less red meat, which could cut animal methane emissions.
...

Thank you for the recommendation, the distinguished Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)! (read the full Reuters article)

But you should note that Al Gore argues for the opposite course of action: eating more red meat so as to shorten cows' lifespan, which has the same aggregate effect of producing less greenhouse gases.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Bill Moyers Journal -- Buying the War


Journalists are supposed to be objective reporters. In the case of the runup to the war in Iraq, most in the U.S. failed miserably in questioning the Bush administration's propaganda which, while exquisitely ingenious, effective, and even matching the infamous Soviet propaganda machine, is not a government tactic that is supposed to be believed so easily in America. But it was, because it served both parties' interests: the administration's geopolitical goals and media companies' profits. With the war drum beats growing loud, only a few stood up to buck the status quo.

Buying the War is a great piece, and along with Why We Fight, Iraq: The Hidden Story, and these Frontline stories, are the best documentaries on Iraq.

By the way, hats off to Bill Moyers and the good (and courageous) guys mentioned in the story:

Jonathan Landay, Warren Strobel, and John Walcott of Knight Ridder
Phil Donahue
Charles Hanley of the Associated Press

And a big F-U to these guys (at the very least, concede your mistakes):

Judith Miller, Thomas Friedman, William Safire, and the New York Times
Charles Krauthammer and the Washington Post
William Kristol and the Weekly Standard
Bill O'Reilly, Roger Ailes, and Fox
Hillary Clinton
Bush, etc.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Man-Induced Global Warming: The Biggest Hoax Ever?


Last May I wrote that I had serious doubts that anthropogenic factors are the cause of global warming. I no longer have doubts--after seeing this documentary, "The Great Global Warming Swindle", from the UK, I am now convinced that man-made actions are not the cause of global warming.

Here are a few quotes from the film:

"...carbon dioxide is not the cause of that warming. In fact we can say that the warming produced the increase in carbon dioxide."

"Humans produce a small fraction, in the single digits percentage wise, of the CO2 that is produced in the atmosphere."

"Volcanoes produce more CO2 each year than all the factories, cars, planes, and other sources of man-made carbon dioxide put together. More still comes from animals and bacteria which produce about a hundred and fifty giga-tons of CO2 each year compared to a mere six and a half giga-tons from humans. And even larger source is dying vegetation from falling leaves for example, in the autumn. But the biggest source of CO2 by far is the oceans."

"...the recent warming of the Earth happened in the wrong place and at the wrong time. Most of the warming took place in the early part of the 20th century and occurred mostly at the Earth's surface, the very opposite of what should have happened according to the theory of man-made global warming."

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Two Powerful Documentaries

I saw a couple of interesting documentaries in the past couple of weeks: This Film Is Not Yet Rated and America: Freedom to Fascism.

The former played in select theaters last year and is now out on DVD. It's about the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) film rating system. Ever wondered how movies are rated and by whom? The answer is: almost nobody knows because the MPAA is a secret organization whose membership is not published. The criteria by which movies are judged are vague and the MPAA doesn't publish specific guidelines. And why is that movies with so many violent scenes can get a PG-13 rating, while a sex scene automatically relegates it to an R rating? As discussed in the documentary, in Europe, the rating system is just the opposite (sex is OK, violence is not). And why should someone else decide what I can or cannot see? It takes a lot of digging by director/writer Kirby Dick to find out some of the mystery behind the MPAA. This is definitely a worthwile film to watch.

The latter film is a documentary mostly about the IRS and taxation on individuals' earnings. Writer/Director Aaron Russo discovers that there is no federal law that mandates paying a federal income tax on wages. In a larger context, the film also touches upon diminishing individual rights in America. This was also a great movie and you can see it on Google for free (see the film Web site to purchase the DVD). Here are a few quotes from the film:


"Do you think America is going deeper and deeper into becoming a police state, and if so, in what ways do you see that as a Congressman? --Aaron Russo

"Yeah, I think, we're moving in that direction, because there is not much we can do without permission. The absence of a police state is that people are free and if you don't commit crimes you can do what you want, but today you can't open up a business, you can't develop land, you can hardly do anything, you can't go the bank, you can't go the doctor without hte government knowing what you're doing. And they talk about medical privacy--that's gone. Financial privacy--that's gone. The right to own property--that's eseentially gone. So, you have to get permission from the government for almost everything, and if that is the definition of a police state that you can't do anyting unless the government gives you permission we're well on our way. This is something that eventually I hope people will get sick and tired of and say enough is enough." --Congressman Ron Paul (TX-R)

The Federal Reserve is a privately controlled entity owned by the major banks of this country.
--G. Edward Griffin, author of
Creature from Jekyll Island

"The war on terrorism is the war on your freedom"

"There is no constitutional basis for a tax on the wages of Americans living and working in the fifty states of the Union" -- Peter Gibbons, Tax Attorney

"If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it." -- Joe Banister, Former IRS Criminal Investigator

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Fuck Organic


I am sick of the organic bullshit. Seriously, the whole thing is now being overplayed. I went to PCC the other day and organic on-the-vine tomatoes were selling for $6.99/lb.! What the fuck is that? Now, I don't mean to pick on PCC, but everything seems to be at least twice as expensive as in a regular store. Organic soda???

I've written about this issue before, and my stance back then was that I thought that I'd try to avoid eating artificial ingredients but I was skeptical about some aspects of marketing organic products. I still think that, but I am now even more skeptical. If I give my dog organic products is he/she going to live longer? Well, the same applies to humans. I'm still going to avoid eating shit food (for example: fast-food, too much meat), but I still believe that food plays a secondary role to genetics and exercise (staying thin), provided that you don't have a malnutrition problem. That's my rant for tonight...